Residential and Architectural Design

Welcome to my Blog!

William T. Baker, Residential Designer
Thanks for visiting. From time to time  I will be post thoughts and comments here concerning architecture, residential design, home design, and classicism. Please feel free to comment and send an email to wtbaker@wtbaker.com. You can also visit my web site for more information at wtbaker.com. Should you need residential design services in the Atlanta area, you've come to the right place!

William T. Baker is the Founder and Principal of one of the foremost residential architecture firms in the United States today. Along with his business partner, architect Bascom W. Murrah IV, he has achieved an international reputation for high-design combined with a keen sensitivity for plans that live well.


0 comments

Diversity and Variety In Art and Architecture

If we observe Nature, and the many facets of its design, we find that the natural order of creation is one of fantastic variety and diversity.  Whether it is a plant, animal, or the elements, diversity is the common denominator.  In color, texture, and form, all of these contain an infinite variety that is incomprehensible.  Should not the works of our hands emulate Nature by creating an architecture that demonstrates this same creativity? 

Our best buildings are enriched through diversity and variety of ornament, sculpture, painting, and the art of the metalworker’s craft.  In the great buildings of past civilizations, these related arts are incorporated in important and prominent ways to enrich the overall fabric of the building.  Sculpture in particular is used to create an interesting play of light and shadow across the façade.  These sculptural elements were often purely decorative, sometimes highly symbolic, never boring.  It is the architect who is responsible for thoughtfully incorporating these works into the fabric of the building.   It is he who is responsible for orchestrating the composition to achieve a complimentary whole.  When the architect is a person of talent, these buildings are a reflection of their time and place.  When the architect is a person of genius, these buildings transcend their time and place and become cultural icons that are universally admired for generations.

Because diversity and variety is the rule and not the exception, the challenge for each society and culture is to produce architecture that is a true reflection of itself, contributing   to the diversity of the world’s built environment.  The necessary component to achieve this goal is the development of an architectural vocabulary that is true to its people, their hopes, dreams, and aspirations.  When one culture successfully accomplishes this task, it is often the case that other cultures adopt this successful architectural vocabulary without developing one of their own.  To avoid this error, each culture must have the confidence and discipline to look squarely at itself to determine what is true and good about itself and what it wishes to say about its past and its hopes for the future through its architecture.  

0 comments

The Challenge for Architecture Today

We live an age where the aesthetic principles of the past are deemed to have lost their relevance and authority.  It is timely, therefore, to review those principles to discover in what ways they can speak anew to our time.  As a building designer having a keen appreciation for tradition-based architecture, I believe a study of the principles underlying the aesthetics of architectural design is more relevant than ever before.  Ours is an age of short-lived architecture generally lacking a sense of permanence.  It is an age that is not building for the future perhaps because the future appears so bleak.  It is an age in which speculative development is driving architectural design more than any great movement from within the architectural profession itself.  Contributing to this situation are the industry professionals, the gate keepers so to speak, who have systematically rejected the idea that such principles are relevant to architectural design.  They have adopted a design philosophy that places a premium on creativity but with no real unifying theory to guide that creativity.  The loss of objective criteria by which architecture may be properly judged diminishes all architecture as a result.  My desire is to present principles to practitioners and students of architecture to establish a common basis for critical analysis.

 

Of equal concern to me is the ongoing trend among the world’s societies of adopting a culturally void architecture.  Societies do this to the detriment of their own culture and the impoverishment of world culture as a collective whole.  It is disturbing to visit foreign lands and find that the general architecture of new buildings strongly resembles the character of our own.  Variety and diversity, not uniformity, should be the goal.

 

Professionals and scholars of our time have not addressed this growing dilemma of architectural uniformity.  In fact, they appear to be endorsing it by their silence.  There is a need for a statement of theory that is relevant for today that speaks to the contemporary needs of divergent cultures.  A new sense of inspiration and direction is needed within the professional community for the design of retail, commercial, religious, and governmental structures.  These are the buildings that form the core fabric of our societies and impact the daily lives of our citizens. 

 

While these principles may seem self-evident to some or irrelevant to others, it is important that they be acknowledged and taught as part of the standard academic curriculum.  There can be no success in architecture or in city building without some coherent underlying unity of thought about the design process.  It is relevant to this discussion to ask why is it that some buildings endear themselves to a society more than others.  Likewise, why is it that such buildings are more often older than new?  The answer to these questions can be found in five principles.

 

I also wish to address the two subjects most frequently ignored by contemporary architectural critics and academics - tradition and ornament.  Their relevance has been marginalized yet their absence in our architecture impoverishes our cities and our world culture.  Tradition and ornament need not be seen as a threat to be avoided.  Rather, they are a continuation of a culture’s heart and soul.  These are the elements that distinguish one people from another.  Architecture without these two foundational members becomes anti-cultural, void of collective memory, and transient in nature.  The traditions of a culture have an important role in any architecture that seeks to speak to its time and place.  Likewise, ornament is the voice of architecture that speaks of the natural creative expression of a people.  By stripping architecture of ornament, our buildings are robbed of that which enriches visually and culturally.  Only when modern practice is reconciled with these two elements of design will we be able to continue our long journey of creating a living classicism for all peoples. 

 

Through this discussion, it will be seen that the principles of design are culturally neutral and more pervasive than any single culture from our collective past. The principles that lead to excellence in architecture are just as relevant to the buildings of Asia as they are to the buildings of the West.  Furthermore, no one culture can claim architectural perfection as its own.  This is a conceit whose time has come to an end.  The principles of aesthetics presented herein are found in the architecture of all the nations and peoples of the world.  All can achieve its perfection and many do.

 

The important issue of architectural aesthetics deserves to be considered in an unbiased way by academics and professionals alike.  To anyone concerned with architectural aesthetics, these principles offer a guide to achieve the tripartite goal of “strength, usefulness, and beauty” as first voiced by Vitruvius two thousand years ago.  The act of building well is of paramount concern to every society because of the lasting legacy it creates for generations to come.  

0 comments

Questions and Answers!

Q. What is the role of ornament in our world of modern architecture?

A. Ornament is the voice of architecture that speaks of the natural creative expression of a people. By stripping architecture of ornament, our buildings are robbed of that which enriches visually and culturally. Only when modern practice is reconciled with these two elements of tradition and ornament will we be able to continue our long journey of creating a living classicism for all peoples.


Q. How do see the role of tradition in architecture today?

A. Tradition and ornament need not be seen as a threat to be avoided.  Rather, they are a continuation of a culture’s heart and soul.  Architecture without these two foundational members becomes anti-cultural, void of collective memory, and transient in nature.


Q. Is western style architecture the answer for the world’s building needs?

A. No one culture can claim architectural perfection as its own.  This is a conceit whose time has come to an end.  All cultures can achieve an architectural excellence unique to their time and place and many do.


Q. Who is responsible for helping a culture achieve architecture of excellence? 

A. Those who practice the art of architecture and the craft of building are the custodians of the physical fabric of our nation, our cities, and our neighborhoods.  It is no easy task, and therefore, governments, universities, and businesses should take the lead to encourage high standards for design and building construction.  In this way, our architecture will more ably weather the test of time.  By making such a commitment, each culture’s built environment will stand as a lasting testimony of their aspirations for their future.


Q. What should architecture have as its ultimate goal?

A. This is the ultimate goal for any architectural style - to mature; to stand the test of time; to be perfected as it is repeated by multiple generations.  When architecture achieves this lofty goal, then it speaks with a voice that transcends its originating culture and can be admired and appreciated by other world cultures.  

Q. Is it really possible for any society to achieve architectural excellence?

A. Every culture, regardless of its size, wealth, or natural resources can create their own architecture of excellence.  And through deliberate and thoughtful effort, each should be encouraged to do so.   

Q.  What do you see as architecture’s role in a society?

A. Architecture has a pivotal role in how a society views itself and its place in the world.  A society’s buildings should express a hope and commitment to the future.

Q. What is the role of “green” architecture in your view?

A. Building only for the short run, and as cheaply as possible, seldom results in a noble built environment.  Such construction is a poor use of the world’s natural resources because buildings of this sort often reach the end of their life expectancy within a decade or so of their construction.  These buildings represent the worse case scenario because their demise cries out to their lack of true aesthetic value, the impermanence of materials used, or their failure as a plan to provide usefulness over a long period of time.  Furthermore, it is in everyone’s interests to build as energy efficiently as is economically viable to conserve resources.  Architects should necessarily make use of the best technology and materials available to provide safe, healthy, and efficient buildings.  The Green Movement is a natural progression in society’s conscious effort to be good stewards of our planet’s resources. 


  

0 comments